This formulae means that GOD ( if existent ), bird, man, dog, ant, bacteria ultimately ensue under uniform consciousness,
though there are varying consciousness. (fey constance)
Here is my definition of fey constance, a term I composed/invented>>
_BEGIN fey constance definition_
Currently, the ceiling of uncertainty may not be quantized, due to the persistence of the seemingly unsolvable problem of universal origin.
p's constantness is insurgent in the issue itself.
Because the problem is universal, and unsolvable despite intelligence range, perception may be observed here as virtually unmoving and invariant.
In the like, although perception p is constant, there are schematics of variances occurring in that constant weave. I call it Fey Constant.
_END fey constance definition_
Now, based on my formulation, since all entities are equal [stone=tree=GOD(if existent)=human=ant=bacteria...etc], in consciousness
all such entities are to be equally considered.
I say all entities must be equally considered, OR rather, no entity has the right to end another entity.
Exemplification: Man kills for food. ( This is invalid )
Following is a brief stipulation of my thinkings regarding God.
It refers to all known forms of God. I decide to give such a stipulation, because God is currently a universal consideration.
_BEGIN views on God.
Now, based on my consciousness formulae, all things are limited a ceiling of uncertainty.
Of those things if there is a God, he or it is included among such things.
So God is just another entity limited by the ceiling, here go, God and everything else is equal.
The point of this entire article is not God.
However, it does bring me to a conclusion about the Christian God, and many a Gods of the like.
This is why stopped believing in God at the time I invented the formulation. c=Pp.
I cannot believe in any entity that authorizes killing of any other entity.
The Christian God sanctions AUTHORITY OVER other entities
because man is superior?
well, my equations point out that rather>>
My formulation, c=Pp, is one that lead me to create an environment called 'micah's construct'. (my middle name is micah)
Micah's construct is one where no consumption takes place.
jealousy, anger, want, desire, murder, adultery, egotism, **, money etc, are all consumptive events.
Most things amidst this current construct are consumptive. (I assume there exists non-consumptive entities)
What burns me is that I need to kill (consume other animals) or plants (eg. callaloo) etc TO SURVIVE
Right now humanity is only trying to emulate nature; emulating nature in technology and purpose, where every piece of technology is nature inspired.
However, emulating nature is insufficient. The fibres of this universe are stitched in recursive destruction and degeneration.
To become true beings, we must realign the nature of the entire universe, into one that minimizes and or doffs (eliminates) consumption.
It would be wrong for all human beings to end it's observation mechanism, (ie kill itself due to the misfortune of this existence)
SINCE WE are of the highest intelligence range, AND WE WILL BE ABLE TO use technology to realign this consumptive construct.
Indeed, not only do we consume, most things consume in this universe.
When I observe the world, what I mostly see humans always wanting to consume.
HOWEVER, technology is inadvertently becoming more and more efficient, requiring less and less consumption.
So, even without desiring a consumption-less existence plane, humanity's technology seems to be approaching that direction.
This is why I say technology/code is the solution to life.
When I converse with other humans, and ask of THEIR opinion, surprisingly,
all of them have thus far responded with common knowledge that energy can neither be created nor destroyed
but change from one to another".
Indeed, energy isn't destroyed, however, they seem unaware of the truth that the thing which encompassed that energy, is destroyed, which is, consumptive, and against
Technology is becoming more and more efficient.
I believe there are ways to merely CONTACT the raw material,
rather than consuming it.
Desiring to leave this existence for Micah's construct is CONSUMPTIVE in the first place,
as I say desire is consumptive, which in turn promotes cognitive dissonance for me.
IT IS BETTER TO TEND TO A CONSTRUCT WITH LITTLE OR NO CONSUMPTION,
than to consume forever, under Christian, Hindu, Natural (nature), etc rules.
This conclusion was born in Jordan's intelligence.
Jordan Micah Bennett, unibrain
I wish nothing for myself; I wish solely that this consumptive existence is realigned... Such is perhaps attainable with science an technology... If cosmological constants yielded an energy transference bounded universe, by modus ponens, it perhaps follows that such constants are affixable... This universe is but a program whose underlying construct is starkly outdated....