Jump to content

Wikipedia page for Codecall

- - - - -

  • Please log in to reply
13 replies to this topic

#1
mebob

mebob

    Programming Expert

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 490 posts
I'm surprised a Wikipedia page hasn't been made for CodeCall yet. Shall we make one?
Latinamne loqueris?

#2
Alexander

Alexander

    It's Science!

  • Moderators
  • 4,120 posts
  • Location:Vancouver, Eh! Cleverness: 200
A website is too general to be in an encyclopaedia, however Wikipedia has a list of guidelines for an article notability:
Wikipedia:Notability - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A lot of websites do not have their own Wikipedia page, for example. Many that do have seen coverage by publications (slashdot-like sites even), are verifiable by secondary sources, etc.

That being said, we do have a lot of history - it would just be up to conforming to all of the guidelines.

Alexander.
Be sure to read the updated FAQ! || Health is achieved through the same 10,000 steps.
If a suggested code/method fails, informing us is less important than telling us why or what errors occurred.

#3
mebob

mebob

    Programming Expert

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 490 posts
Oh, I see. What exactly makes DaniWeb Wikipedia-worthy though? Do they have enough publicity?
Latinamne loqueris?

#4
Alexander

Alexander

    It's Science!

  • Moderators
  • 4,120 posts
  • Location:Vancouver, Eh! Cleverness: 200
That article should be rewritten, it contains a barrage of original content that is unverified/unverifiable

Quote

("especially well known among the vBulletin community")
Where is an impact to prove this statement?

Quote

("[...] gaining widespread attention throughout the search engine optimization industry")
By releasing a single mod_rewrite hack? Where has it made an impact? What has it lead to?

I will in fact write some reminders on the page to add references. They do however reference two articles that were publicised.
Be sure to read the updated FAQ! || Health is achieved through the same 10,000 steps.
If a suggested code/method fails, informing us is less important than telling us why or what errors occurred.

#5
WingedPanther

WingedPanther

    A spammer's worst nightmare

  • Moderators
  • 16,831 posts
  • Location:Upstate, South Carolina
  • Programming Language:C, C++, PL/SQL, Delphi/Object Pascal, Pascal, Transact-SQL, Others
  • Learning:Java, C#, PHP, JavaScript, Lisp, Fortran, Haskell, Others
I was on one forum, not sure if it was this one or not, and the moderator tried to force the forum onto Wikipedia. Wikipedia moderators just repeatedly killed it.
Programming is a branch of mathematics.
My CodeCall Blog | My Personal Blog

#6
Roger

Roger

    If nothing goes right, go left.

  • Administrators
  • 718 posts
  • Programming Language:C, PHP
  • Learning:Python
In my understanding, most sites try to get on Wikipedia for the PR/backlink juice in the past. I had a site that was referenced by Wikipedia and it drove a massive amount of traffic (and legitimacy).

However, as mentioned earlier, notability is a hard thing to claim, especially due to our small audience.
Check out our update Guidelines/FAQ. When posting code, remember to use code tags - Posted Image.

#7
RhetoricalRuvim

RhetoricalRuvim

    JavaScript Programmer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,254 posts
  • Location:C:\Countries\US
Why not just have a Wikipedia page that lists online forums and their descriptions?

#8
lethalwire

lethalwire

    while(false){ ... }

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 748 posts
  • Programming Language:Java, PHP
  • Learning:Java, PHP

RhetoricalRuvim said:

Why not just have a Wikipedia page that lists online forums and their descriptions?
Wouldn't that page be endless?

#9
RhetoricalRuvim

RhetoricalRuvim

    JavaScript Programmer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,254 posts
  • Location:C:\Countries\US
Better than making endless pages, one for each forum.

#10
Microsuck

Microsuck

    Newbie

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 14 posts

RhetoricalRuvim said:

Better than making endless pages, one for each forum.

Or eliminate the problem as they're doing now:

Don't put any forum on that doesn't meet the notability guidelines.

#11
Alexander

Alexander

    It's Science!

  • Moderators
  • 4,120 posts
  • Location:Vancouver, Eh! Cleverness: 200

RhetoricalRuvim said:

Why not just have a Wikipedia page that lists online forums and their descriptions?

There is, and a link to here was already on it, and it got lost during large edits. It would not really matter anyway.
Be sure to read the updated FAQ! || Health is achieved through the same 10,000 steps.
If a suggested code/method fails, informing us is less important than telling us why or what errors occurred.

#12
Roger

Roger

    If nothing goes right, go left.

  • Administrators
  • 718 posts
  • Programming Language:C, PHP
  • Learning:Python
I wonder when the edit happened. I recall that Codecall's PR (pagerank) was hire sometime last year, but then it dropped, so was wondering if we lost a key link from somewhere.. Maybe it's the Wikipedia link that was lost...??
Check out our update Guidelines/FAQ. When posting code, remember to use code tags - Posted Image.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users