I'm surprised a Wikipedia page hasn't been made for CodeCall yet. Shall we make one?
13 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 03 November 2011 - 01:18 PM
Latinamne loqueris?
|
|
|
#2
Posted 03 November 2011 - 07:02 PM
A website is too general to be in an encyclopaedia, however Wikipedia has a list of guidelines for an article notability:
Wikipedia:Notability - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A lot of websites do not have their own Wikipedia page, for example. Many that do have seen coverage by publications (slashdot-like sites even), are verifiable by secondary sources, etc.
That being said, we do have a lot of history - it would just be up to conforming to all of the guidelines.
Alexander.
Wikipedia:Notability - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A lot of websites do not have their own Wikipedia page, for example. Many that do have seen coverage by publications (slashdot-like sites even), are verifiable by secondary sources, etc.
That being said, we do have a lot of history - it would just be up to conforming to all of the guidelines.
Alexander.
Be sure to read the updated FAQ! || Health is achieved through the same 10,000 steps.
If a suggested code/method fails, informing us is less important than telling us why or what errors occurred.
If a suggested code/method fails, informing us is less important than telling us why or what errors occurred.
#3
Posted 04 November 2011 - 10:20 AM
Oh, I see. What exactly makes DaniWeb Wikipedia-worthy though? Do they have enough publicity?
Latinamne loqueris?
#4
Posted 04 November 2011 - 03:24 PM
That article should be rewritten, it contains a barrage of original content that is unverified/unverifiable
Where is an impact to prove this statement?
By releasing a single mod_rewrite hack? Where has it made an impact? What has it lead to?
I will in fact write some reminders on the page to add references. They do however reference two articles that were publicised.
Quote
("especially well known among the vBulletin community")
Quote
("[...] gaining widespread attention throughout the search engine optimization industry")
I will in fact write some reminders on the page to add references. They do however reference two articles that were publicised.
Be sure to read the updated FAQ! || Health is achieved through the same 10,000 steps.
If a suggested code/method fails, informing us is less important than telling us why or what errors occurred.
If a suggested code/method fails, informing us is less important than telling us why or what errors occurred.
#5
Posted 04 November 2011 - 05:55 PM
I was on one forum, not sure if it was this one or not, and the moderator tried to force the forum onto Wikipedia. Wikipedia moderators just repeatedly killed it.
#6
Posted 04 November 2011 - 06:17 PM
In my understanding, most sites try to get on Wikipedia for the PR/backlink juice in the past. I had a site that was referenced by Wikipedia and it drove a massive amount of traffic (and legitimacy).
However, as mentioned earlier, notability is a hard thing to claim, especially due to our small audience.
However, as mentioned earlier, notability is a hard thing to claim, especially due to our small audience.
Check out our update Guidelines/FAQ. When posting code, remember to use code tags -
.
.
#7
Posted 04 November 2011 - 09:21 PM
Why not just have a Wikipedia page that lists online forums and their descriptions?
#8
Posted 05 November 2011 - 01:13 PM
RhetoricalRuvim said:
Why not just have a Wikipedia page that lists online forums and their descriptions?
#9
Posted 05 November 2011 - 02:29 PM
Better than making endless pages, one for each forum.
#10
Posted 05 November 2011 - 04:28 PM
RhetoricalRuvim said:
Better than making endless pages, one for each forum.
Or eliminate the problem as they're doing now:
Don't put any forum on that doesn't meet the notability guidelines.
#11
Posted 07 November 2011 - 03:13 AM
RhetoricalRuvim said:
Why not just have a Wikipedia page that lists online forums and their descriptions?
There is, and a link to here was already on it, and it got lost during large edits. It would not really matter anyway.
Be sure to read the updated FAQ! || Health is achieved through the same 10,000 steps.
If a suggested code/method fails, informing us is less important than telling us why or what errors occurred.
If a suggested code/method fails, informing us is less important than telling us why or what errors occurred.
#12
Posted 07 November 2011 - 07:58 AM
I wonder when the edit happened. I recall that Codecall's PR (pagerank) was hire sometime last year, but then it dropped, so was wondering if we lost a key link from somewhere.. Maybe it's the Wikipedia link that was lost...??
Check out our update Guidelines/FAQ. When posting code, remember to use code tags -
.
.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users


Sign In
Create Account


Back to top









