Well I just downloaded it and here is my thoughts:
- The splash page is the exact same and all the features listed were there before.
- I has loaded codecall faster than usual
- To be blunt, I will be happy with this update if Firefox can run for 2 hours+ without crashing and taking my entire system with it.
- I would also be happy if it does happen it doesn't corrupt my 6 month old server map :(
That's my slice of cake
6 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 24 June 2011 - 04:25 PM
Please, write clearly with proper structure. Double spacing makes the text feel un-jointed, Capitalizing Every Word Means People Stop Before Every Word Sub-Consciously Which Is A Pain In The Backside, and use code tags! (The right most styling box).
|
|
|
#2
Posted 25 June 2011 - 12:45 AM
I quite enjoyed looking at mozilla.com and seeing that new fangled Firefox +0.5 version, I'm not sure why the jumpy release (4.0 was months ago) although with all this HTML5/JS hype it may give them some edge.
Be sure to read the updated FAQ! || Health is achieved through the same 10,000 steps.
If a suggested code/method fails, informing us is less important than telling us why or what errors occurred.
If a suggested code/method fails, informing us is less important than telling us why or what errors occurred.
#3
Posted 25 June 2011 - 03:35 AM
Meh. I noticed no dramatic change... Firefox has always been stable for me - except when on a Mac!
#4
Posted 25 June 2011 - 04:01 PM
They're mostly doing an accelerated release schedule, people see it as controversial, harder to push security updates. Firefox 6/7/8 will be soon to follow with new functioning although not too much else.
Be sure to read the updated FAQ! || Health is achieved through the same 10,000 steps.
If a suggested code/method fails, informing us is less important than telling us why or what errors occurred.
If a suggested code/method fails, informing us is less important than telling us why or what errors occurred.
#5
Posted 28 June 2011 - 12:44 PM
Does Firefox do autoupdates yet like Chrome? Perhaps if they did, it wouldn't be so controversial. Lor, I completely agree with you. Firefox on Mac is complete rubbish.
#6
Posted 28 June 2011 - 03:47 PM
John said:
Does Firefox do autoupdates yet like Chrome? Perhaps if they did, it wouldn't be so controversial.
It would be even more so if it does update automatically, each new release would reveal (or fix) issues of the previous release (that is not of great age) and introduce more, any user at a business or enterprise may be at risk without a carefully tested version and this makes it very hard.
Mozilla has raised concern on this.
Be sure to read the updated FAQ! || Health is achieved through the same 10,000 steps.
If a suggested code/method fails, informing us is less important than telling us why or what errors occurred.
If a suggested code/method fails, informing us is less important than telling us why or what errors occurred.
#7
Posted 17 July 2011 - 12:26 AM
I mean I find FF slows don to a crawl after a while (but not any more).
Last time this took down my server and corrupted my world files, also I got a ton of blue screens recently (probably just my lappy celebrating its 1 and a half birthday!).
Last time this took down my server and corrupted my world files, also I got a ton of blue screens recently (probably just my lappy celebrating its 1 and a half birthday!).
Please, write clearly with proper structure. Double spacing makes the text feel un-jointed, Capitalizing Every Word Means People Stop Before Every Word Sub-Consciously Which Is A Pain In The Backside, and use code tags! (The right most styling box).
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users


Sign In
Create Account


Back to top









