Jump to content

C++ Compiler

- - - - -

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
10 replies to this topic

#1
haraldur

haraldur

    Learning Programmer

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 50 posts
Can anyone here tell me what is the best c++ compiler for windows and for linux. i used Dev c++ on Windows but it sucked so what is the best compiler for windows and linux? plz tell me

#2
asafe

asafe

    Programmer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 107 posts
The "best" is subjective. G++ for Linux and VSC++(whose compiler I don't remember the name) for Windows are good options.

#3
Guest

Guest

    Writes binary right handed and hex left handed

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,414 posts
Code::Blocks is probably the best IDE. It can use any compiler as a backend, and I think it uses g++ by default.

Edited by Guest, 29 November 2009 - 02:00 PM.
added link

Root Beer == System Administrator's Beer
Download the new operating system programming kit! (some assembly required)

#4
WingedPanther

WingedPanther

    A spammer's worst nightmare

  • Moderators
  • 16,831 posts
dev-c++ isn't a compiler, though it does use MinGW by default. In what sense did it suck?
Programming is a branch of mathematics.
My CodeCall Blog | My Personal Blog

#5
CommittedC0der

CommittedC0der

    Speaks fluent binary

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,565 posts
I have Dev-c++ plus and its OK but I really like Microsoft Visual C++ 2008 Express Edition its a lot better its a free trail for like thirty days then all you have to do is register which is really easy and you get the full version hope I helped.(for windows not Linux)
A man can be defined by what he does when no one is looking.
Science is only an educated theory, which we cannot disprove.

#6
xzane

xzane

    Newbie

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 10 posts
For windows i use Microsoft Visual C++ 2008 Express Edition.

#7
Irfan_A

Irfan_A

    Programmer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 186 posts
Up to now i still use Dev-C++ to try create DLL, but i still learning how to programming in C/C++ because i come from BASIC. Ah okey, based on above discussion, i am interested for using Code::Blocks too for comparison... .

#8
g-man122

g-man122

    Newbie

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 29 posts
MinGW is pretty good, why do you say it sucks ? It's better than the Microsoft one(depending on what you want to do), it's best if you're going to be using inline assembly. It also supports AT&T asm, I believe.

Otherwise, use Watcom, or Code::Blocks, as somebody above has said.

#9
WingedPanther

WingedPanther

    A spammer's worst nightmare

  • Moderators
  • 16,831 posts
Code::Blocks uses MinGW by default. It's just an IDE.
Programming is a branch of mathematics.
My CodeCall Blog | My Personal Blog

#10
g-man122

g-man122

    Newbie

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 29 posts
Oh, my bad. I've never used Code::Blocks, lol.

#11
KevinC

KevinC

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 1 posts
I use Code::Blocks