Can anyone here tell me what is the best c++ compiler for windows and for linux. i used Dev c++ on Windows but it sucked so what is the best compiler for windows and linux? plz tell me
C++ Compiler
Started by haraldur, Nov 29 2009 09:43 AM
10 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 29 November 2009 - 09:43 AM
|
|
|
#2
Posted 29 November 2009 - 12:09 PM
The "best" is subjective. G++ for Linux and VSC++(whose compiler I don't remember the name) for Windows are good options.
#3
Posted 29 November 2009 - 02:00 PM
Code::Blocks is probably the best IDE. It can use any compiler as a backend, and I think it uses g++ by default.
Edited by Guest, 29 November 2009 - 02:00 PM.
added link
Root Beer == System Administrator's Beer
Download the new operating system programming kit! (some assembly required)
Download the new operating system programming kit! (some assembly required)
#4
Posted 29 November 2009 - 03:57 PM
dev-c++ isn't a compiler, though it does use MinGW by default. In what sense did it suck?
#5
Posted 30 November 2009 - 10:36 PM
I have Dev-c++ plus and its OK but I really like Microsoft Visual C++ 2008 Express Edition its a lot better its a free trail for like thirty days then all you have to do is register which is really easy and you get the full version hope I helped.(for windows not Linux)
A man can be defined by what he does when no one is looking.
Science is only an educated theory, which we cannot disprove.
Science is only an educated theory, which we cannot disprove.
#6
Posted 02 December 2009 - 12:02 PM
For windows i use Microsoft Visual C++ 2008 Express Edition.
#7
Posted 28 December 2009 - 08:40 AM
Up to now i still use Dev-C++ to try create DLL, but i still learning how to programming in C/C++ because i come from BASIC. Ah okey, based on above discussion, i am interested for using Code::Blocks too for comparison... .
#8
Posted 28 December 2009 - 09:05 AM
MinGW is pretty good, why do you say it sucks ? It's better than the Microsoft one(depending on what you want to do), it's best if you're going to be using inline assembly. It also supports AT&T asm, I believe.
Otherwise, use Watcom, or Code::Blocks, as somebody above has said.
Otherwise, use Watcom, or Code::Blocks, as somebody above has said.
#9
Posted 28 December 2009 - 10:27 AM
Code::Blocks uses MinGW by default. It's just an IDE.
#10
Posted 28 December 2009 - 11:00 AM
Oh, my bad. I've never used Code::Blocks, lol.
#11
Posted 28 December 2009 - 11:29 PM
I use Code::Blocks


Sign In
Create Account


Back to top









