Well... at first when I use search from the 'Start Search' it worked fine, and it still does work fine, except for when I write in 2005 (to bring up visual studio 2005) instead the first icon comes up as Google Earth... so what does the text GOOGLE EARTH has to do with the number 2005?
Do you see something similar? Because I don't! So why does the search bring up Google Earth in the start menu???
Can I fix this?
Vista Search Acting Stupid?
Started by TcM, Jun 23 2009 03:14 AM
11 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 23 June 2009 - 03:14 AM
|
|
|
#2
Posted 23 June 2009 - 03:55 AM
That doesn't happen for me. But I think the Vista search is not only searching the file name, but I'm not sure.
#3
Guest_Jordan_*
Posted 23 June 2009 - 05:00 AM
Guest_Jordan_*
I've seen Vista bring up irrelevant results before, as well. I'm wondering if the version "5.0" of Google Earth is causing the problem. What happens when you type just "5"?
#4
Posted 23 June 2009 - 05:10 AM
"No Items Match Your Search".. it says that :/ when i type in 5
#5
Guest_Jordan_*
Posted 23 June 2009 - 06:31 AM
Guest_Jordan_*
Funny. Go Vista!
#6
Posted 23 June 2009 - 07:22 AM
Lmao - I suppose they dont specialize in search - maybe the Windows section of Microsoft should get together with the Search (Bing) hah
#7
Guest_Jordan_*
Posted 23 June 2009 - 07:54 AM
Guest_Jordan_*
I still remember the Windows Live desktop search that was horrible. If you've ever used outlook for searching, you'll realize just how bad MS is at searching which makes me wonder w(hy)tf they would even consider creating a search engine in the first place.
#8
Posted 23 June 2009 - 09:51 AM
#9
Guest_Jordan_*
Posted 23 June 2009 - 09:54 AM
Guest_Jordan_*
Did you search for problems, though?
#10
Posted 23 June 2009 - 11:42 AM
Well.. the version of google earth is 5.. but wtf does 2005 has to do with 5?
#11
Posted 23 June 2009 - 12:46 PM
TcM said:
Well.. the version of google earth is 5.. but wtf does 2005 has to do with 5?
2005 - 2000 = 5 lol :D
I don't know really... :P
Maybe it's called that too, or that their copyright is from 2005...
#12
Posted 23 June 2009 - 01:20 PM
Nope, copyright is not from 2005


Sign In
Create Account


Back to top












