Linux is said to be more secure because of the user permissions etc (like the CHMOD) and that's an ext3 thing right? So if we based Linux on another file system it would be less secure?
ext3
Started by
Guest_MarkA_*
, Dec 01 2008 05:42 AM
10 replies to this topic
#1
Guest_MarkA_*
Posted 01 December 2008 - 05:42 AM
Guest_MarkA_*
|
|
|
#2
Posted 01 December 2008 - 09:17 AM
No, that's not an ext3 thing. ext3 represents HOW the files are laid out on the hard-drive.
#3
Guest_Jordan_*
Posted 02 December 2008 - 06:50 AM
Guest_Jordan_*
There are several other filesystem types available to Linux such as EXT, EXT2, etc..
#4
Guest_MarkA_*
Posted 02 December 2008 - 08:59 AM
Guest_MarkA_*
But the permissions of access of the files.. don't they depends on the filesystem? Or not?
#5
Posted 03 December 2008 - 04:11 AM
Well, it's not recommended to use NTFS for Linux.. that's for sure.
#6
Guest_LemonMan_*
Posted 03 December 2008 - 10:46 AM
Guest_LemonMan_*
And why is that?
#7
Posted 04 December 2008 - 06:19 AM
TotalPenguin said:
Well, it's not recommended to use NTFS for Linux.. that's for sure.
How could you use NTFS for Linux?
#8
Guest_LemonMan_*
Posted 04 December 2008 - 07:37 AM
Guest_LemonMan_*
Why can't you?
#9
Posted 01 February 2009 - 10:10 AM
MarkA said:
Linux is said to be more secure because of the user permissions etc (like the CHMOD) and that's an ext3 thing right? So if we based Linux on another file system it would be less secure?
#10
Guest_racerman_*
Posted 03 February 2009 - 05:16 AM
Guest_racerman_*
What has the storage of files to do with security?
#11
Guest_MarkA_*
Posted 03 February 2009 - 12:49 PM
Guest_MarkA_*
I've got not idea... just read something, maybe I misunderstood it.


Sign In
Create Account

Back to top










