Hello, I have the impression that SOLARIS is one of the most stable and solid OS'es out there, if not the most. Is that right or I am mistaken?
Solaris - solid OS?
Started by rumen, Jun 27 2008 03:10 AM
10 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 27 June 2008 - 03:10 AM
|
|
|
#2
Posted 27 June 2008 - 06:05 AM
rumen said:
Hello, I have the impression that SOLARIS is one of the most stable and solid OS'es out there, if not the most. Is that right or I am mistaken?
Well ... it's also hardware bound too.
If you want to go with expensive, but corporate backup, go with solaris. They have solid maintenance contracts and certified solaris techs that can come out and fix everything, they also have a GREAT tech support phone number that is great for asking even the dumbest questions.
So, on one hand, it is very stable and very solid, has great support - if you're willing to pay for it. It's also hardware bound to SUN architecture (unless you get the x86 stuff and I don't know what kind of support they offer for that).
So, thumbs up if you have the money to put into it.
In my experience, I worked with a very large multimedia news company that converted the majority of their boxes over from SUN to LINUX to save money. They kept a lot of their HQ and database machines on solaris and maintained the contracts that way, but their webserver farms are all linux. But I think thats the way it is with a lot of large webhosting companies.
#3
Posted 28 June 2008 - 03:15 AM
Thanks a lot for the detailed answer, Lissa:)
#4
Posted 28 June 2008 - 01:18 PM
I thought Solaris could be installed on just about any computer these days?
#5
Posted 28 June 2008 - 08:05 PM
Tor said:
I thought Solaris could be installed on just about any computer these days?
Yes, thats the solaris x86. Looks like I'm a bit behind the curve on this one. My understanding is that they're still not up to par with their x86, but I could be way off the mark on that.
#6
Guest_Jordan_*
Posted 29 June 2008 - 06:46 AM
Guest_Jordan_*
I've never used Solaris in a server environment (we use HP-UX) but the x86 version ran great. It used the Java Desktop (is that based on Gnome)?
#7
Posted 29 June 2008 - 02:32 PM
The x86 version seems fine but I've never used another version either on a real unix system. I can't really compare :D
#8
Posted 05 July 2008 - 05:53 AM
hmmmm i too want to know about solaris.. heard many things abt it bt nver got anything to knw deeply...can sumone tell more..
penis enlargement pumps cialis
#9
Posted 05 July 2008 - 06:01 AM
There is a review here under the reviews tab.
#10
Posted 05 April 2009 - 03:37 PM
It's being used by government and on schools. I definitely recommend it with just playing around and getting familiar with a Unix system.
#11
Guest_Revenge1_*
Posted 03 May 2009 - 06:28 PM
Guest_Revenge1_*
Solaris's only issue at the moment is it has a relatively small collection of drivers. I spent days writing a hacked up BCM43 driver just to get 802.11 up and kicking.


Sign In
Create Account


Back to top









