Jump to content

History of Linux

- - - - -

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
9 replies to this topic

#1
Guest_Jordan_*

Guest_Jordan_*
  • Guests
This was posted on CodeCall and thought it would be neat for people to see here:

http://kde-files.org...poster_v1.1.png

It is missing some of the newer flavors of Linux.

#2
TcM

TcM

    Writes binary right handed and hex left handed

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,147 posts
Well it's quite nice but too complicated...

#3
Hektor

Hektor

    Programmer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 126 posts
It is a bit complicated. Any chance of a slimmed down version?

#4
Kaabi

Kaabi

    Learning Programmer

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 56 posts
I see, so it's a picture. I thought it was a written description; I can't really understand that graphic.

#5
v0id

v0id

    Retired

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,936 posts
I don't find it hard to read the picture.

The long, black line in the middle of the picture is showing the history of the Linux kernel. It starts in the left side where we're given some information about the kernel in the current year (the years can be read in the top), in this case, 1991. As the time goes on the version of the kernel increases. On March 13th, 1994, we see version 1.0, on June 9th, 1996, we see version 2.0, and so on.

In the meanwhile different Linux distributions derives from the Linux kernel. The different colored and black lines are the distributions deriving from the kernel / using the kernel. An example is Debian which shows up on August 16th, 1993. Again we can see that new distributions are deriving from Debian (from its line), like Ubuntu on October 20th, 2004.

All the lines which are slowly stopping (shown by the dotted lines) or stopping suddenly (shown by a line which is suddenly stopped) shows that the particular distribution is discontinued (except in the end of the picture (far out at right)) where the dotted lines are just showing that future of the distributions are unknown, as the timeline (from 2006) can't predict the future.

I hope that helped on the understanding.

#6
Kaabi

Kaabi

    Learning Programmer

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 56 posts
Thanks v0id, I understand it a little better now, but I never will completely.

#7
Tor

Tor

    Programming Expert

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 486 posts
You just need to look at it for a while before you understand it.

#8
TcM

TcM

    Writes binary right handed and hex left handed

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,147 posts

Tor said:

You just need to look at it for a while before you understand it.

Totally agree. At first it looks quite complicated.

#9
Kaabi

Kaabi

    Learning Programmer

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 56 posts
Most complex things look incomprehensible at first.

#10
dheeruyadav

dheeruyadav

    Learning Programmer

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 30 posts

v0id said:

I don't find it hard to read the picture.

The long, black line in the middle of the picture is showing the history of the Linux kernel. It starts in the left side where we're given some information about the kernel in the current year (the years can be read in the top), in this case, 1991. As the time goes on the version of the kernel increases. On March 13th, 1994, we see version 1.0, on June 9th, 1996, we see version 2.0, and so on.

In the meanwhile different Linux distributions derives from the Linux kernel. The different colored and black lines are the distributions deriving from the kernel / using the kernel. An example is Debian which shows up on August 16th, 1993. Again we can see that new distributions are deriving from Debian (from its line), like Ubuntu on October 20th, 2004.

All the lines which are slowly stopping (shown by the dotted lines) or stopping suddenly (shown by a line which is suddenly stopped) shows that the particular distribution is discontinued (except in the end of the picture (far out at right)) where the dotted lines are just showing that future of the distributions are unknown, as the timeline (from 2006) can't predict the future.

I hope that helped on the understanding.

hey thanks for helping us in understand :)