What do you guys think, should c at all be callled a high level language?
Should c be a high level language or a ow level language?
Started by Chinmoy, Jun 05 2008 03:14 AM
15 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 05 June 2008 - 03:14 AM
God is real... unless declared an integer
my blog :: http://techarraz.com/
|
|
|
#2
Posted 05 June 2008 - 07:04 AM
Wow..... C is an obvious low level language.
#3
Posted 05 June 2008 - 07:33 AM
I do absolutely agree with MeTh0Dz. C is - and has always been a low-level programming language.
#4
Posted 05 June 2008 - 12:33 PM
I view C as low-level as well.
#5
Posted 05 June 2008 - 12:59 PM
And which do you think is a high level one?
#6
Posted 05 June 2008 - 01:16 PM
Do you understand the difference between a low and high level programming language?
#7
Posted 05 June 2008 - 01:20 PM
I guess C++ is a High-level language as its easy to understand and uses simple English words in its syntax
A Low-level Language would be Assembly language as its difficult to understand.
A Low-level Language would be Assembly language as its difficult to understand.
#8
Posted 05 June 2008 - 04:01 PM
DELETED
Yeah, Slice Ownz Your Posts.
Get over it
/Talk
Yeah, Slice Ownz Your Posts.
Get over it
/Talk
Edited by xXHalfSliceXx, 14 July 2008 - 06:36 PM.
#9
Posted 05 June 2008 - 09:47 PM
Well, before startin out i would like you to read here :: High-level programming language - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
and here :: High Level Language.
That c is a low level language is not a widely accepted and obvious fact. It is a hugely debated topic because c is the switch from low to igh level.
and here :: High Level Language.
That c is a low level language is not a widely accepted and obvious fact. It is a hugely debated topic because c is the switch from low to igh level.
God is real... unless declared an integer
my blog :: http://techarraz.com/
#10
Posted 06 June 2008 - 12:33 AM
MeTh0Dz said:
All I could do was lol. Assembly is a low level language because it is hard to understand. (LOL) Is brainfuck a low level language?
Lol because C++ it uses simple English words.
How do you claim to know C++ and then say some **** like that?
You fail.
Lol because C++ it uses simple English words.
How do you claim to know C++ and then say some **** like that?
You fail.
That was written in my School text-book. Now that can't be wrong !
#11
Posted 06 June 2008 - 02:58 AM
LOL what school do you go to? Someone seriously wrote that the difficulty to read a language differentiates whether it is a high or low level language. That teacher should be shot, and the textbooks burned.
#12
Posted 06 June 2008 - 07:37 AM
C and C++ have nearly identical syntax.
The distinction between High, Mid, and Low-level languages is fuzzy at best. Syntax is not part of the definition of any of them. I tend to view C and low-mid, and C++ as mid-high, based on feature set. With libraries such as Boost and wxWidgets, C++ slides higher, but can still function as a low-level if needed.
The distinction between High, Mid, and Low-level languages is fuzzy at best. Syntax is not part of the definition of any of them. I tend to view C and low-mid, and C++ as mid-high, based on feature set. With libraries such as Boost and wxWidgets, C++ slides higher, but can still function as a low-level if needed.


Sign In
Create Account


Back to top









