Jump to content


Check out our Community Blogs

Register and join over 40,000 other developers!


Recent Status Updates

View All Updates

- - - - -

What is C#?


  • Please log in to reply
108 replies to this topic

#37 Guest_Jordan_*

Guest_Jordan_*
  • Guest

Posted 17 September 2008 - 04:07 AM

I wouldn't go that far although it isn't bad.
  • 0

#38 MeTh0Dz

MeTh0Dz

    CC Leader

  • Just Joined
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1726 posts

Posted 17 September 2008 - 04:12 AM

just few days i heard about this language i thnl its much better than c and c++.


Yeah dude I can definetly tell that you are someone who should be judging languges.

Oh, but if you like to be limited, use a ** framework, and run inefficient code then I guess you would be right.
  • 0

#39 Xav

Xav

    CC Mentor

  • VIP Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8356 posts

Posted 17 September 2008 - 11:11 AM

Obviously you're not talking about C#.NET...
  • 0
If you enjoy reading this discussion and are thinking about commenting, why not click here to register and start participating in under a minute?

#40 chili5

chili5

    CC Mentor

  • Expert Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3038 posts
  • Programming Language:Java, C#, PHP, JavaScript, Ruby, Transact-SQL
  • Learning:C, Java, C++, C#, PHP, JavaScript, Ruby, Transact-SQL, Assembly, Scheme, Haskell, Others

Posted 18 September 2008 - 01:55 PM

I don't see how .NET isn't efficient? You can create full GUI's very quickly, isn't faster more efficient?
  • 0

#41 MeTh0Dz

MeTh0Dz

    CC Leader

  • Just Joined
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1726 posts

Posted 18 September 2008 - 02:49 PM

I don't see how .NET isn't efficient? You can create full GUI's very quickly, isn't faster more efficient?


Are you serious? Why are .NET groupies always talking about development time? The end user does not GIVE A ****, how long it takes to develop it. They care how it runs. Code in a .NET language is inefficient, that is all there is to it.
  • 0

#42 chili5

chili5

    CC Mentor

  • Expert Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3038 posts
  • Programming Language:Java, C#, PHP, JavaScript, Ruby, Transact-SQL
  • Learning:C, Java, C++, C#, PHP, JavaScript, Ruby, Transact-SQL, Assembly, Scheme, Haskell, Others

Posted 18 September 2008 - 02:54 PM

Yes, I still stand behind .NET, and well built .NET applications can run quite quickly. There are a lot of .NET based web sites that run really well, oh and the language C#.

It's not that inefficient, if lots of web sites run on it.
  • 0

#43 MeTh0Dz

MeTh0Dz

    CC Leader

  • Just Joined
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1726 posts

Posted 18 September 2008 - 03:03 PM

How the ** does web sites using it prove that it isn't inefficient? You don't know what you're talking about...

You are just blindly standing behind it without facts.
  • 0

#44 Guest_Jordan_*

Guest_Jordan_*
  • Guest

Posted 18 September 2008 - 03:48 PM

Are you serious? Why are .NET groupies always talking about development time? The end user does not GIVE A ****, how long it takes to develop it. They care how it runs. Code in a .NET language is inefficient, that is all there is to it.


Prove it. And not with words. :)
  • 0

#45 amrosama

amrosama

    CC Mentor

  • VIP Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2765 posts

Posted 18 September 2008 - 04:11 PM

There are alot of complicated applications built with dot net , like "blink 3d builder"(c#.Net) which makes complex 3d environments in really short time.
Enough with the memory issues, most of pcs now have huge hard drives and processors with faster than 1.4 ghz
plus .Net is already included in windows xp sp2 and higher
  • 0

#46 MeTh0Dz

MeTh0Dz

    CC Leader

  • Just Joined
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1726 posts

Posted 18 September 2008 - 06:02 PM

You want me to prove it?

Alright I'm going to code some benchmark programs.
  • 0

#47 Xav

Xav

    CC Mentor

  • VIP Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8356 posts

Posted 19 September 2008 - 08:00 AM

Yes, I still stand behind .NET, and well built .NET applications can run quite quickly.

Rally the troops! Man the guns! We're in this together, lads!
  • 0
If you enjoy reading this discussion and are thinking about commenting, why not click here to register and start participating in under a minute?

#48 Aereshaa

Aereshaa

    CC Devotee

  • Just Joined
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 638 posts

Posted 19 September 2008 - 08:16 AM

He said C++ and C bahahaha!!! I'll post some benchmarks circa 6 hours from now.
  • 0




Recommended from our users: Dynamic Network Monitoring from WhatsUp Gold from IPSwitch. Free Download