|
||||||
| Software Development Tools Tools to help encrypt, install or anything else for Software Development |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||||
|
Neither I. I just know that I got that score.... there are no grading criteria that explain like 50-70 it means....
__________________
CodeCall Blog | CodeCall Wiki | Shareware | Linux Forum Chat with other CodeCall members on IRC; connect to irc.codecall.net and join #codecall ![]() Business Directory | Technology Blog | Windows Help |
|
|||||
|
Well maybe someone can explain what it means.....
__________________
CodeCall Blog | CodeCall Wiki | Shareware | Linux Forum Chat with other CodeCall members on IRC; connect to irc.codecall.net and join #codecall ![]() Business Directory | Technology Blog | Windows Help |
|
|||
|
Basically Acid 3 is a series of test suites. When you get 100% on a test suite it counts as a single pass. So basically 54 means that Firefox gets 100% on 54 of the test suites and less than that on the others.
The Webkit/Safari guys went into how they went from 54 to about 90 in a matter of weeks because there was a huge bunch of tests they had almost passed. It's quite good that we have two browsers (albeit beta's or even alpha's) that pass Acid3, the last one took an age to pass properly and it shows that we are at least seeing some progress on the web standards front. Looks to be a battle that will be won in spite of Microsoft. Essentially the tests are designed to cover the functionality that has been broken in web browsers in the past, or is as of yet completely lacking in implementation. The W3C standards often lack a base implementation so in a way the acid tests show how the standard is supposed to work. It enables browsers to target something rather than going on their merry way and coming up with 5 different interpretations of the standard. It also robs MS of the ability to say 'The standard was vague' when they do something utterly contrary to what the standards say (as MS tend to, having done everything in their power to break the internet).
__________________
Currently bemused by: LLVM. |
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|||
|
I personally suggest Mozilla Firefox. It's far more secure than IE. Reasons being that IE is fully integrated throughout the Windows OS. It is your 'My Computer' and all of that ya know? Firefox is a stand-alone web browser. Also, ActiveX is disabled by default. ActiveX controls are possible reasons why spyware and malware could be affecting your PC. So just head over to Firefox web browser | Faster, more secure, & customizable You won't regret it. Give it a try and i m sure you will really like it.
__________________
http://www.trgauba.com/ |
|
|||||
|
Firefox isn't necessarily more secure but it can be it depends on your settings, what extensions you have and so on. I got Firefox 3 today and absolutely love it.
![]() ---------------- Now playing: 3 Doors Down - Changes via FoxyTunes
__________________
Success is the ability to go from failure to failure without losing your enthusiasm. ~ Winston Churchill |
|
|||
|
FireFox Rocks!
__________________
Test Management Tool |
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Tutorial - An Internet browser! | travy92 | VB Tutorials | 8 | 02-17-2008 09:10 PM |
| Qustion about 'web browser' identification- mobile | standard240 | General Programming | 1 | 09-30-2007 11:44 PM |
| Most Used Browser | Saint | Website Design | 54 | 07-17-2007 07:28 PM |
| OidView Pro MIB Browser 2.7 | Kernel | Software Development Tools | 0 | 09-28-2006 07:12 AM |
| Resize Browser Window | NeedHelp | JavaScript and CSS | 1 | 05-06-2006 09:48 AM |