.html or not?

[TcM]

What do you think? Should I make .html after a URL? Or I should leave it like url.com: Search with Many

or it's better if it was
url.com: Search with Many

Somewhere I read that it makes difference, but just thought to ask here to be sure...

[Jordan]

I think the .HTML at the end is better for SEO but I could be wrong.

[TcM]

I think the .HTML at the end is better for SEO but I could be wrong.

Yes that is what I read too, and .html is even better then .php or something else.. but I want to be sure and I know in here there are people that know things better then I do. So thanks.

[kisna]

yes, .html is better than .php extension for SEO.
.html pages are called static and .php extension are called dynamic page and static pages are better for Search Engine Optimization.

[kavinpparker]

Yes. .html is better for SEO. Crawler index static pages easily than dynamic pages.

[kavinpparker]

Yes. crawler like static pages than dynamic pages. So .html will be a better choice.

[TcM]

Thanks, I converted all my .php extensions to .html extensions.

[zoekmachine]

Static pages are better than Dynamic and generally .html is better than .php but it is nothing wrong if you have 2 static page that display exactly same content and one is example.html and other one example.php
When people say that SE does nto like dynamic pages then they think about example.php?sid=ffbfd6d080795f076268d71b205facef or similar

[TcM]

Well I don't use that at all. I just have the .php extension, but now It's good having .html.

[Sionofdarkness]

I don't think the extension matters so much as long as you are using HTML. Not all HTML pages end in .html, but that doesn't mean they don't use HTML.