Ok, at work we are going to install Linux.. but still need much time.. but before we actually plan to do this on all computers, I need to know if it is really worth the trouble to change.. we store very sensitive data and we need maximal security..
So is Linux worth all this trouble?
Short answer: Maybe.
Long answer: it depends a LOT on what type of data you have, how you currently access it, if any of it is dependent on software that only runs on Windows, etc, etc, etc.
In addition, it depends on HOW you are implementing security for your Windows computers, your internal network, your DMZ (if it exists), etc, etc, etc.
Not only do you have to worry about external security, but internal as well.
If the physical security is weak it doesn't matter what O/S you're using.
In my opinion it's easier to secure a linux server just because I'm more comfortable in linux then windows. Although back when me and some friends hosted rooting contests and honey-pots I'll say I've seen a windows server tighten down just about as much as a from scratch linux install.
So we better tighten on firewalls (hardware) etc.. rather than which OS to use?
Physical security is locks on doors.
Well, as long as I'm concerned I'm not responsible for that :/ I think that someone else should be concerned about locks on doors lol, not the IT dept
It always went into my risk assessments when I setup new servers or networks.
Physical security is also more then locks on doors it's disabling/removing fast media drive access devices, maybe having no monitors or keyboards in the server room and other things.
The net admin should know where he's weak, how to strengthen his weakness and have a disaster backup plan.
Think this is getting off topic which wasn't my intention.
Well it's good to know these... but still I want to focus on more computer related security.. still thanks for your input though
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks