Closed Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: SATA Raid and Linux

  1. #1
    Hektor is offline Programmer
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    126
    Rep Power
    0

    SATA Raid and Linux

    I'm looking for a cheap solutions for a SATA raid and have about 1 terabytes of space.

    I see this, RocketRAID 1640 - is it any good? http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16816115015

    Not bad for only $86! I'll get a couple of 400 gig SATA Hard Drives as well.

  2. CODECALL Circuit advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Posts
    Many

     
  3. #2
    Penguin Guest
    RocketRAID is very good hardware! This version, however, isn't actually a hardware raid. It is a software raid and thus, isn't as fast as a hardware raid. It is much cheaper and a great option though.

  4. #3
    Jame Guest
    That one is software raid like Penguin Said. Upgrade to this one: http://www.highpoint-tech.com/USA/rr1810a.htm

    Same company and very nice hardware raid!

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    11,209
    Blog Entries
    6
    Rep Power
    101
    Well those for sure are nice hardware, but from my experience I will never (until it is a critical need) use any RAID devices.

  6. #5
    KernelKorn Guest
    I am curious TalkPenguin as to why you are so adamantly against raid? It would seem to me to be a useful way of building in redundancy for important systems. Is there a way that you would prefer?

  7. #6
    Lop Guest
    RAIDs are excellent for data protection. I curious to know why you are against them as well.

  8. #7
    powerspike Guest
    if your going to get a cheap card, it's going to be more then likey pesduo raid (the raid support is done in the drive in the system and not on the card). and if you are going to go that route, i would recomend using linux software raid, and not a card, mainly because if the card dies, and you can't get a replacement, your pretty much screwed. if you use linux software raid, it's alot easier to managed, and alot more portalable

    if you want pure speed, go raid 0 (striped), if you want some speed and don't much losing a bit of disk space go 1 or (0+1), personaly i always use raid 5 or 6, basicly raid 5 is the size of all the disks -1, and raid 6 is the rame, but -2, and you get most of the speed from all the disks (raid 5 is basicly striped and paridy so you get speed and backup).
    raid 0 - lose a disk, ALL data gone (pure speed)
    raid 1 - lose a disk, still have data (speed and backup)
    raid 5 - lose a disk, still have data (lotsa speed and backup)
    raid 6 - lose _2_ disks, and still have data. (a little slower then raid 5 but high level of reduancey)

    hopefully that information will help a few people.

  9. #8
    Oigen is offline Programmer
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    107
    Rep Power
    0
    What have you got against RAID devices? I was led to believe that there weregreat, especially for data protection reasons.

Closed Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. RAID
    By AdvMutant in forum The Lounge
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-15-2011, 09:56 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-06-2011, 05:33 AM
  3. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 11-25-2008, 07:30 PM
  4. SCSI Raid?
    By Hektor in forum Linux Hardware
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-17-2007, 06:25 PM
  5. Raid 5
    By Jordan in forum Technology Ramble
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-07-2006, 07:04 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts