|
||||||
| HTML Programming Forum discussion covering HTML, XHTML, DHTML and all flavors of HTML. Hypertext Markup Language is used to create websites. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
I have a Web site whose pages are XHTML 1.0 Strict, and the vast majority of them are valid pages, according to the W3C validation page. Some of the pages are not valid, however, as I use some items such as target="_blank" and ol start="26" and items like that.
Would any problems develop with indexing (or with anything else) if I decided to make the invalid pages transitional and keep the rest strict? Is it ok to have a mix of XHTML 1.0 Strict and XHTML 1.0 Transitional on a single site? |
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|||||
|
I believe you would use strict to ensure that it works on devices that don't have a full browser like phones and smartphones. This ensures that they display it correctly.
__________________
CodeCall Blog | CodeCall Wiki | Shareware Site | Linux Forum | Write a Blog Don't hesitate to ask any questions that you have! Check out our ASCII Calculator! |
|
|||
|
Quote:
I don't think this will make any trouble. Cheer up. Just make sure it looks the same in most commonly used browsers. |
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| Xav | ........ | 1357.94 |
| MeTh0Dz|Reb0rn | ........ | 1075.89 |
| WingedPanther | ........ | 919.18 |
| marwex89 | ........ | 906.86 |
| morefood2001 | ........ | 900.18 |
| John | ........ | 890.77 |
| Brandon W | ........ | 770.65 |
| chili5 | ........ | 312.39 |
| Steve.L | ........ | 264.99 |
| dcs | ........ | 232.34 |
Goal: 100,000 Posts
Complete: 83%