Closed Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Compatibility

  1. #1
    eric is offline Newbie
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    17
    Rep Power
    0

    Lightbulb Compatibility

    I've been thinking about upgrading my computer and I came across a few questions. First of all, does the motherboard have to be designed to handle dual core processors or are they all compatible as long as the sockets match?
    I have the Giga-Byte GA-81915p duo pro.

    I was also curious about cpu speed. I noticed that many of the dual core processors are lower speeds. I currently have an intel 3.2 hyper threaded Prescott processor. What dual core processor would be at least equal to that?

    I was looking at graphics cards as well. I currently run an x800xl and the fan stopped working. Since I need a new one I figured I might as well upgrade. I was thinking about the ATI Radeon X1650 PRO Video Card. Any feedback on this card? Thanks in advance.
    _________________
    Last edited by Jordan; 11-16-2007 at 06:36 AM.

  2. CODECALL Circuit advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Posts
    Many

     
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    538
    Rep Power
    21
    Usually they can be made compatible but need a ROM upgrade first. Many mobo manufacturers won't do this in order to bring about more sales. Check with your manufacturer.

    Clock speed does not measure performance. This is why AMD stopped listing clock speed and started listing apparent power a long time ago, Intel soon followed suit*. The real issue is how many cycles an instruction takes. Recent processors have looked at reducing the time taken to perform an instruction. In any case, the older processors don't hit clock speeds as high as they claim and even if they did the modern ones take fewer clock cycles per instruction.

    *both still list Mhz but that has been used as an abstract measure of power rather than being the actual clock speed. What happened is AMD started to produce processors that had a much lower clock speed that ran much faster than the Intel equivalent. They started to list clock speeds of the Intel processors that gave equivalent power to their processors rather than listing their own clock speed. Later on Intel did something similar and for a long time we basically had a meaningless measure. The Core 2 processors actually are labelled by clock speed again.
    Last edited by G_Morgan; 11-23-2007 at 06:52 AM.

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    11,209
    Blog Entries
    6
    Rep Power
    101
    Radeon? Nah that's crap! I would not buy a radeon again.... A few days ago I would have said that Radeon was not bad... but now, because of what is happening now, It is crap!

Closed Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. MHTML Compatibility
    By Hunter100 in forum The Lounge
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-22-2011, 06:33 PM
  2. VBA/Office2007 Compatibility
    By zimonheus in forum Visual Basic Programming
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-28-2010, 10:32 AM
  3. C++ exe Compatibility XP Vista
    By TyK in forum C and C++
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-19-2009, 06:20 AM
  4. Joomla 1.5 compatibility please
    By aravot in forum easyContact
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-31-2007, 04:50 PM
  5. SEF compatibility, please.
    By aravot in forum easyContact
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-16-2007, 05:05 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts