Creating an OS

NeedHelp · 06-26-2006, 07:48 AM

What consists of creating an OS in C++? What needs to be done to allow the computer to boot to your OS and what can you make it in? For instance, can you make it with Visual C++ 2005? Just curious on what needs to happen.

**TkTech** · 06-26-2006, 02:46 PM

you probably could, but i highly suggest NOT using Visual C++. By defualt it has way to many dependencies. For making your own os, check osdever.net and http://www.mega-tokyo.com/forum/ ( near the bottom ). These are resources ive used to build my hobby os. Also, make sure you know assembler, and id recomend you use C to make your first os.

**Void** · 06-27-2006, 01:43 PM

TkTech, where is your hobby OS at? I'd love to see it!

**TkTech** · 06-27-2006, 02:19 PM

the older one is at tktech.org/orion.php . I havent updated the site yet.

**Void** · 07-02-2006, 07:34 AM

Originally Posted by TkTech

you probably could, but i highly suggest NOT using Visual C++. By defualt it has way to many dependencies. For making your own os, check osdever.net and http://www.mega-tokyo.com/forum/ ( near the bottom ). These are resources ive used to build my hobby os. Also, make sure you know assembler, and id recomend you use C to make your first os.

Building an OS as a hobby sounds like a lot of fun. How did you get into building OSes? How often to you work on it?

Kaabi · 07-03-2006, 04:41 PM

My friend once made an OS, it was a long time ago and he never told me what language he used to make it (I guess it must have been C++). It was so weird, but that's probably just because I'm so accustomed to Windows.

**dargueta** · 10-07-2007, 04:31 PM

I'd definitely recommend using assembler for a small-scale OS. Try making small generic component functions and programs, then build upwards from there. Not only is everything modularized so that bugs will be easier to find, but it will also be easier to modify and/or update. Assembler gives the advantage of being small and fast, and if you write your own routines you won't get a lot of the garbage dependancies that C and C++ have.

NeedHelp · 10-09-2007, 06:10 PM

Sounds a bit complicated writing in assembly though. I have no idea how to use it.

**dargueta** · 10-09-2007, 06:25 PM

Writing programs in assembler can be frustrating for large-scale applications, but if you break things up like I said, it shouldn't be impossible. If performance or size is your concern, then use assembler. DO NOT use C++. C++ has way too many libraries that it requires, too many dependencies, and MFC is terrible. Use C if you want to make a powerful OS without too much of a headache.

If assembler is your choice, there are some great tutorials lying around on the Internet; Google is great. Here are some good ones; I suggest you go in order. The last one is the best, but you might want to at least look over the first two to get your feet wet.

Tutorial for Assembler Programming Newbies
A Brief x86 Assembler Tutorial
The Art of Assembly Language Programming

**v0id** · 10-09-2007, 10:41 PM

I would also choose to write an OS in Assembly, but not the entire OS. I would create the bootloader in Assembly, and all the other low-level stuff, and then switch to x86-mode, and use C. C is nowadays almost as fast as Assembly. The compilers are getting really good, and if you don't think they aren't good enough, you can always use optimizers and profilers.

I once wrote a bootloader, but if I had continued building on an OS, I would had continued with C - but probably some Assembly also.